Solve or Black wins

Any move that White plays, except the winning move, will allow Black to beat him later in the game.

Discover how skipping the exact mate-in-two can turn triumph into defeat 👉

Sometimes, players who come from the world of practical chess (to the artistic puzzles) complain a little about the strict demand for “mate in two”.
They say: “Why should it matter how many moves? A win is a win”.
Well, in this not-so-difficult puzzle we find a fine example showing how neglecting to look for the precise mate in two could actually cost you the game — even in a real, practical battle.


2# by SHLOMI YERUSHALMI

📖Read more about this Art-Puzzle

💡Recommendation: Try solving it yourself first

Solved it yet?
Read more
💙We especially liked:
4/5 - (45 votes)

2 thoughts on “Solve or Black wins”

  1. There is a really simple win here in two moves – first to A4 and then to B5. It’s pretty clear. But the system here doesn’t accept it as a correct solution for me. Please fix it.

    1. Hi Noah,
      You’re not alone in seeing that line — many solvers are drawn to it, and for good reason. It does look like a clean and convincing win at first glance. ♟️
      What makes it fall just short is not a direct refutation of the plan itself, but a subtle interruption: Black can create an urgent problem that White must deal with first, which delays the second move and breaks the intended timing. That’s why the system doesn’t accept it as a full solution.
      We really appreciate you taking the puzzle seriously and looking for clarity — these timing nuances are a big part of what the composition is about.

      The ChessAPit Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top